What is in scope?
Confirm the connected provider, tenant or programme and the checks available for it.
Home / Features / Governance Software
Governance software for cloud risk and compliance
Bring collected cloud information into GovernSafe's compliance workspaces. Review controls, evidence and follow-up in context. AI can prepare a draft, but an authorised person decides whether it updates the control record.
Coverage depends on the provider, connector and configured data. GovernSafe does not replace a traditional enterprise GRC suite.

Product view: supported Microsoft 365 identity, device and security context. Coverage varies by connected provider.
Start with the decision
A status is only useful when the reviewer can see its scope, source and next decision. Keep gaps in collection visible instead of treating unknown evidence as a failed control.
Confirm the connected provider, tenant or programme and the checks available for it.
Check collection time and coverage. A newly opened dashboard does not make the underlying data current.
Name the reviewer, the evidence they need and the actions that still require approval.
Controls, evidence and follow-up
Keep the control question, supporting material and accountable person in the same review path.
Choose the control, provider signal or policy decision under review.
Keep missing, stale and accepted material visibly different.
A person reviews AI proposals and accepts or rejects the response.
Keep the owner, policy version, next action and review date together.
A planned review, generated draft or pending upload does not show that a control is operating. Review the evidence before accepting it. These workflows do not guarantee certification, auditor acceptance or complete framework coverage.
AI assistance and agentic workflows
Each module has its own inputs, validation rules and human decision point. A draft, vendor report or security finding is evidence for the next decision, not autonomous judgement.
Compliance AI
Explain a SOC 2 control, prepare response or policy text and identify gaps from the supplied context.
An authorised person approves or rejects the proposal before it updates the control record.
Vendor review
Prepare a vendor review from public policies and other cited sources, then make gaps visible for follow-up.
Missing public evidence is not proof that a control is absent, and the report does not make the vendor decision.
Controlled beta
Map an authorised application, run bounded tests and retain the evidence used to validate reported findings.
Coverage depends on the agreed scope and validator. A pilot cannot guarantee complete vulnerability coverage.
These workflows do not authorise changes to your cloud environment. Model access and plan limits apply where AI is used.
Follow-through
Keep control ownership, accepted evidence, policy versions and assigned tasks visible. Missing material stays open until a reviewer has enough support for the response.
Governance reports
Dashboards help explain the environment covered, evidence considered and questions still open. A compliance audit package can include an evidence manifest and integrity hash for the reviewed scope.
The manifest does not bundle every underlying evidence file. Confirm how reviewers will receive the supporting material they need.
Choose your evaluation path
For your organisation
Bring one question about access, configuration, evidence or reporting. Walk through the relevant GovernSafe views, confirm what the source supports and assign the next action.
For MSPs, MSSPs and advisers
Bring one client scenario. Confirm the supported providers, permissions, evidence requirements and the decisions that remain with your client before packaging an offer.
Provider coverage, freshness and available actions vary by connector, configured data and module.
Tell us which provider, control, evidence or reporting question you need to resolve. We will confirm the relevant coverage, review steps and the work your team would own.